Press Enter

Share with your friends and help them crack UPSC!

Or Share on

Answer

Correct Option is Both (II) and (III)

Solution:There is not enough evidence in the statement to conclude (I). It is mentioned in the statement that the event is a gimmick but is also a block buster money maker which clearly suggest that such events are able to draw people’s attention, so, (II) can also be inferred. As it is given in the statement that Floyd is a 49-time undefeated champion whereas boxing is a new sport for McGregor, so (III) can also be inferred.

Get access to all of our verified questions